Captive breeding programs conservation

That could be due to differences in activity schedules each day, or in which parts of the habitat they preferred to hang out. Slade and colleagues conclude by calling on researchers to report the mating outcomes following reintroductions, since so little is known about the potential pervasiveness of this problem. Goldman 03 December Source: Slade B. Paproth, M. Magrath, G. Assortative mating among animals of captive and wild origin following experimental conservation releases, Biology Letters, 10 11 Tags: genetics.

Home Conservation This Week The little-known downsides to captive breeding programs. The little-known downsides to captive breeding programs December 3, Conservation This Week 2 Comment The answer is: California condors, Black-footed ferrets, and Kihansi spray toads. Goldman 03 December Source: Slade B.

Tweet this article Share on Facebook Pin on Pinterest. Conservation Archive. However, in some cases, efforts to retain genetic diversity can also slow down the rate of population size increase because the retention of diversity is often facilitated by equalizing the number of offspring from each set of parents. Managing captive populations in such a way that genetic diversity is not lost and population size is increased, then, becomes important in order to manage these sometimes-conflicting goals.

This is particularly true if the goal of the captive breeding program is reintroduction of populations into wild habitats. Florida, CC Attribution 2. If you have trouble accessing this page because of a disability, please contact the Webmaster at fnrweb purdue.

Captive Breeding. The wildlife often suffers because of the lack of proper care and medical facilities. Enclosed space enables caretakers to assess the health of the primates regularly.

They can, thus, be proactive in case of a spread of a disease or a general decline in health. Hence these places provide a safe and closest natural environment for the animals to breed and grow.

They ensure the animals get all their basic necessities in a controlled but natural setting. Everything from the temperature, climate, surroundings, etc. So captive breeding ensures the animals get a natural habitat of their own. The population hence produced and nurtured in these controlled settings is of good health. Moreover, zoos are often also able to cross-breed the animals and enhance the gene pool.

Such can be done in different zones, from zoos or settings all around the world. So the possibilities to explore are endless! An interesting and amazing advantage to these programs is reintroducing the nurtured population back into the wild.

So many of the once-endangered animals now have a success story and were easily shifted back to the natural setting, just like the Arabian Oryxes. The best part is that these captive breeding programs give the animals a chance at life. As a result, we can preserve nature and species which would otherwise be lost to nature taking its course. While there are a number of advantages of captive breeding programs, there are a few concerns as well.

Not all species have had successful in-house breeding, as we discussed in the pros and cons of captive breeding. So is captive breeding bad? Often a great concern of the animal rights activists and organizations is that the animals are not treated well in many places.

Such restrictive environments like cages often limit them physically and can do more harm than good. This is typical for larger animals like tigers , elephants, and gorillas.